User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

In principle, I cannot say anything bad about Арб. It has many advantages, and some of them are downright unique. Most scanners, it feels like, have become mired in competition with one another and forgotten about users, while Арб is following its own path—and successfully. For example, there is a Chrome extension here that improves connection quality and the speed of finding a surebet. I also like that here you can have a minimum number of bookmaker accounts for successful earnings. The functionality is not as extensive as that of АББ, so I cannot give it five stars, but I think that at this rate, this scanner will overtake everyone in the future.

Despite all Arb’s obvious and less obvious advantages, I can’t understand why everyone overlooks one small detail: there’s only football here! While other scanners try to expand their coverage as much as possible, adding things like horse racing or rugby, the owners here don’t care at all. It’s like, it works, and that’s enough. Well, users seem to praise it, so let’s just ignore it and keep making money from subscriptions. Great move! I don’t understand who uses this scanner at all. I bought a one-day subscription, and that was enough for me. I’ll go look for something else.

This scanner was a pleasant discovery for me. The team of creators has a fresh approach; they try to approach the matter unconventionally, and therefore ArbMate is somewhat unlike other programs. The surebets look different, the information is arranged differently, and the overall picture is presented more completely right away. Theoretically, if you really don't want to pay for a subscription and have a lot of free time, you could even try to find the selected surebets yourself, since the scanner shows the match start time and the odds from several bookmakers for each outcome. The only thing is that the team names are hidden. Quite a puzzle for someone with nothing else to do. If you have more important things to do, the subscription here is inexpensive; I took six months at once and recouped it in about 10 days.

The scanner is rather questionable. It is fairly well made and seems convenient, and there are some tutorials for beginners. But who are the surebets themselves even made for? What is the point of providing detailed information, listing percentages, and selecting several bookmakers if there are barely any matches? You go to prematch and see that the top suggestions are games taking place in two weeks. Respect, of course, for the long-term planning. But who needs that? In my view, arbitrage betting works according to a slightly different scheme.

A middling representative of the scanners, with obvious pros and cons. Of the advantages, I like the Chrome extension. It's a kind of intermediate station between Rebel, which even released its own program, and standard programs that work in the browser. To be frank, the extension offers no direct advantages, but at least it convinces you that everything will work faster. There are disadvantages too—very weak equipment specifically needed for arbitrage betting. There are surebets and middles, but the line is weak. Detailed information replaces calculators, but you still have to calculate the stakes manually. Overall, a three. Based on what is available now, a real gem could be made, but the developers are in no hurry to fix the situation.

Арб initially attracted me because among all the bookmakers being scanned, you can select just a few main bookmakers on which to build your strategy. The idea is not bad, but its implementation turned out mediocre. The surebet size suffers because of this, and the same bookmakers keep appearing in the line. Sometimes it seems that you could keep accounts with just two of them and still remain steadily in the black. If so, then why are these scanners needed at all? A dubious proposition. Otherwise, the scanner is not bad; it finds genuinely good options both prematch and live.

There is little good to say. I thought it was some kind of original idea, a new word in surebet scanning, but it turned out to be just a pile of new ideas that still need a lot of work. Despite all these features, such as convenient surebets, extensions, and Polish middles, I did not like using it. The line is weak, the bookmakers are always the same, the surebets are not the strongest, games two weeks ahead constantly hang in prematch, while in live mode there are events that have already ended.

This is not just a scanner; it is a complete educational system capable of turning a noob into a professional arbitrage bettor. Here you do not simply look at surebets and place bets; you learn under an expert's guidance, study the finer points, and build long-term strategies capable of providing stable income. Forking was developed with users of any skill level in mind. I have been using surebets for several years, but I was able to learn a lot of new things here and expand my own knowledge base.

After a month of using the scanner, I still don't understand what I paid that much money for. Everything is done well, there is a lot of useful information, and well-known bookmakers are scanned, but this can also be found in other programs, while articles on the subject, if necessary, can simply be searched for on the internet. So I maintain that the price is greatly inflated. The average daily yield here is 4-5%. You need almost the entire month to recoup the monthly subscription, and you can only move into profit with a substantial initial bankroll.

The scanner has good functionality. The surebets are described in detail and selected intelligently. Several sports allow the site to fill both the line and live mode. The developers did their best to speed up the betting process for players, integrating both a calculator and bookmaker opening. But that also worked against them. There are so many functions and buttons here that you can get completely lost without finding what you need. This is an example of a scanner where they wanted to demonstrate all the possibilities of software arbitrage betting, but the owners of Forking are unlikely to attract a substantial audience.

I cannot say that I liked this scanner, but no critical shortcomings were noticed either. The interface is confusing, and the prices are frightening. Judging by the reviews, it is possible to recoup the subscription without any problems, but in my case, for example, the starting capital was quite limited, so I barely ended up in the black. Naturally, I did not renew the plan. Nevertheless, I can understand the people who recommend Форкинг. It is convenient here, beginners are helped, and experts are consulted. If you want, you can figure out all these buttons that fill the screen, but I could not.

Forking is expensive, but it's convenient. You open the suggested surebets, take a look, and there are lots of options from different sports. You click the one you like, and both the bookmakers and the calculator open immediately. I identified the stakes and placed everything in 10 seconds. This feature is a real lifesaver in live. I'm already afraid that I'll become so lazy that it will be difficult for me to use other scanners where everything has to be done manually. I took the simplest 30-day subscription here and paid 210 bucks. There's also one for 995 dollars, also for only 30 days, with some additional advantages, but I didn't check what exactly they were. For that kind of money, they probably have special people doing everything themselves, while the user only has to read text messages about incoming payments.