User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

A modern scanner designed for fast and accurate play. During two months of use, I encountered lag a couple of times and saw a dead surebet once. I know what percentage of people encounter similar problems in other scanners, and I can say that the figures here are almost perfect. A host of specialists work on the platform, ready to guide a new bettor literally by the hand from their first surebet to calculating their monthly profit. I did not like that the functionality is overloaded and you are often distracted by unnecessary buttons. But overall, I will give it four stars.

I liked this scanner. It is convenient and clear, all the functions are where they should be, and the emulation allows the program to do almost everything for you. Bets are placed very quickly, so you have time to place everything you wanted in live mode. The plans are reasonable too; you do not have to pay a lot of money, you choose the offer you need and recoup the amount spent in 4-5 days. I have no problems with bookmakers; all the operators are well known, and there are always surebets with my accounts. I recommend Forks to those who do not want to complicate things and are looking for a simple, clear resource for fast arbitrage betting.

Everything is done in the dumbest way possible. The main page says that live surebets are taken from Позитив. So why should I register here and buy anything if I can pay for a Позитивбет subscription and work there without any hassle? I logged in to look at the surebets without registering, and I saw that 10 options had already been listed and nothing was hidden, so I thought, well, not bad—I can check the quality before subscribing. Then I looked more closely, and the same listing had simply been duplicated 10 times. Facepalm. I do not recommend anyone get involved. It feels like they cobbled together some little program and now want to make money as quickly as possible.

Overall, a fairly decent program. First, you can see what it is like and then subscribe. It is not like Форкинг, where you cannot get past the start page without registering. Everything here is geared toward live, and the developers have made every effort to speed up the process of placing a bet. The odds are updated, the stakes are placed automatically, the bookmakers open, and the user practically has to do nothing. This is also where the downside lies, because if there is some error in the calculations, you may not find out about it until the very end.

There’s something dubious about this scanner. It doesn’t search for anything itself; it takes its data from Positive. When you choose a surebet, it opens the bookmakers itself in the same browser. Convenient, of course, but my paranoia tells me that you shouldn’t expose yourself to bookmakers by using identical IP addresses. You’ll end up giving yourself away, and no limits will be enough. I saw information that the scanner has protection and a guarantee of anonymity, but I’ve already seen so many promises from arbitrage betting search programs, and then, when they didn’t come true, all I got was a standard brush-off from support. Forget it; I’d rather stick with the old-fashioned BB or ABB.

I read the information on the форкс site and smiled. One of the points says that the bookmaker will not find out that you use a scanner. Interesting—how will that help us? The bookmaker generally does not care what I use. If I am arbitrage betting and depriving them of profit, then something needs to be done about me. Whether I got the information from the scanner or calculated it myself, they do not care. That said, things are quite good here: the surebets are conveniently presented and the legs are assigned automatically, but there are times when there are very few surebets. This happens on weekends, when a lot of matches are being played. Either the staff are cutting corners, or there are some delays in rewriting data from another scanner. Given this choice, I would rather use other sites.

There are quite a lot of sports, many bookmakers being scanned, but there is no result. I cannot understand what the point is. You open another site and see 10 football surebets listed with bookmakers such as Bet365 and 1xBet. You go to Forks—silence. Sometimes there are a ton of arbitrage betting opportunities and you cannot keep up, while at other times it is empty. Maybe they shut down for maintenance or inventory, I do not know. If they improved this aspect, I would confidently give it five stars, because it is convenient to work here. But what is the point of all these features if there is nowhere to apply them?

In my opinion, this is the best scanner for live surebets. I haven't encountered such speed and quality of operation anywhere else. You take the offered arbitrage betting, and the percentages and stakes are already calculated for you; you only need to place the bet. You have time to do everything before the odds change. With this speed of operation, you can earn well if you stay glued to it. But a couple of hours a day is enough for me to recoup the subscription and move into profit. I hope the scanner continues developing in the same direction.

Despite being a side project of the creators of Positivebet, it turned out quite well. It is clear that they devoted time to the scanner, made an effort to improve its operation somehow, and focused on live. The surebets found are good, and the quantity suits me. Bets are placed quickly; there is no need to calculate anything yourself. The plans are pleasant too, the prices are affordable, and anyone can afford a subscription. Personally, I lack freedom of maneuver. It seems that many bookmakers are scanned, yet the line contains the same names. On the one hand, this is convenient because only well-known sportsbooks are represented, but on the other, what is the point of scanning several dozen companies if they are of no use?

So-so. The scanner's only advantage is that it works with Betfair. The exchange has helped me out more than once, and I can trust it. Otherwise, not particularly. The surebets constantly include only those bookmakers that watch arbitrage bettors and are ready to cut limits over one wrong move. The scanner somehow provides anonymity, but at the same time, with every leverage calculation, it enters fractional amounts and suggests placing them. With protection like that, no attack is needed.

Someone tell the developers that it is no longer 2012. It feels as if they made the scanner once and left everything as it was. No updates, no improvements, nothing is happening. The functionality may have been good 10 years ago, but now all the top programs are many times better than this one. While the scanner is searching for a surebet, you can go to the kitchen and brew yourself some tea. Seriously, are there still arbitrage bettors willing to wait two minutes for a surebet search? That is excessive even for prematch. It seems that if I prepare in advance, I will be able to find everything faster than the program.

I'd heard so much about this scanner that I couldn't resist and decided to buy a subscription and try it myself. I can say that everything turned out to be neither as good nor as bad. I already knew in advance that the search was slow and that there was no arbitrage betting in live at all, but I liked the ability to select the bookmakers I needed. Why would I want surebets with bookmakers where the balance is empty or there is no account at all? Here you immediately get the necessary figures and make money.