At first I simply registered because there was an opportunity to see how the scanner worked without paying. It became clear from the one-percent surebets that there were obvious problems. My doubts arose when they offered an arbitrage bet where one of the events had odds of 70. I understand that anything can happen, but this wasn’t an isolated case. In principle, it’s enough to pay a little attention to what you’re betting on and there won’t be any problems, but I would recommend some other scanner to new bettors. BB or Positive, for example. And Surebet will suit experienced arbitrage bettors who don’t care about all these modern trends and rules.
User Reviews of Surebet Scanners
Reviews of scanners bookmaker forks
The position of the administration of the project is such that there can exist no question that it would be impossible to solve.
So share your opinions, join the discussion. We are grateful for all the comments!
Not a bad platform for finding surebets in prematch and selecting the right bookmakers. There are convenient filters that, when set, screen out unnecessary bookmakers and work only with those where the user has money in their account. This makes it possible not to spread yourself across a bunch of accounts, but to work closely with several operators that will not cut all the limits after a week. On the other hand, the search for surebets is very slow. It is not so critical in the line, but it is still annoying. Especially when you know that during the same time another scanner will produce 5-6 times more options.
An excellent scanner for simple and thoughtful earnings through prematch arbitrage betting. The scanner is made easy to understand, so beginners can figure it out. Technical support works at the proper level; questions are resolved quickly. I've been using it for about a year and don't want to change platforms, since I'm used to working here specifically. I have no complaints, I'm steadily in profit, the subscription doesn't hurt my pocket, so what more do you need? I know I could find an even better option, but there is no need for that.
I don't understand those who say that Шурбет is very bad and morally outdated. Nothing changes in the world of arbitrage betting. Yes, you need to be more careful than before, but the rules remain the same, the formulas remain the same, so why should the program become different? Of course, technology is developing and all that, but why break something that already works fine? My only complaint about the scanner is its speed, but I don't consider that a critical problem.
A very bad scanner. Old, slow, uneven, with the feeling that it is about to fall apart. Searching for surebets takes almost two minutes. You wait and wait, and it gives you some bogus odds that have no right to exist. Then you wait again, and it throws two outcomes for the same event at you. You write to support, and get silence in response. I don’t know whether it is possible to make money here at all. It looks more like arbitrage bettors are confidently heading into the red with such a service.
Despite its age, the scanner handles its duties quite well. There are enough surebets here; personally, more than enough for me. There are three-outcome bets, and only the bookmakers that the user specifies themselves in the filter are selected. The subscription is inexpensive and includes both value bets and middles, which makes it possible to work on all fronts. I really expected live to appear in addition to prematch; the owners had made such a promise, but so far nothing has happened.
If you have a choice and can afford a subscription to any scanner, I do not recommend choosing Шурбет. It works normally, but it is incapable of meeting the modern needs of arbitrage betting. There is no live; all surebets are only prematch. The search itself takes a very long time. It is stated to take about 100 seconds, but in reality it may search for 2 minutes or even 3. After waiting, it may produce both high-quality surebets and outright nonsense with a pile of errors.
For a free platform, everything works quite well. To be honest, I expected some kind of dump where nothing was clear and there was a crowd of people rushing in for freebies. But no—the functions are well laid out, the site interface is clear, and the surebets themselves are quite good. I will not visit here regularly, since I have a subscription to Ребеле, but I did take a look at a couple of selected arbitrage bets.
For a free platform, everything works quite well. To be honest, I expected some kind of dump where nothing was clear and there was a crowd of people rushing in for freebies. But no—the functions are well laid out, the site interface is clear, and the surebets themselves are quite good. I will not visit here regularly, since I have a subscription to Ребеле, but I did take a look at a couple of selected arbitrage bets.
You cannot use this scanner on a permanent basis; that is only logical. If a bunch of users simultaneously look at the proposed surebets and place bets on them at the same time, what will the result be? Especially considering that bettors who access the free scanner are generally registered with several of the main, most popular bookmakers. Naturally, the specialists at the bookmakers will quickly identify such odds, and those who use them as well. Respect to the guys for their charity, but this path will not lead to anything good.
I still could not understand how good this scanner is. I really wanted to see what the free program was like and whether it was genuinely possible to make a living from arbitrage betting without paying for subscriptions. I was unable to do this for one simple reason — it was Saturday, and so many people flooded into the scanner that the site simply froze, showing no signs of life. The creators clearly did not expect to find so many people wanting to use the discovered surebets for free. The scanner crashed, and all I can say is that the creators knew what they were getting into.
A pleasant scanner, with many functions and fairly well-thought-out operation. You can set the odds however is most convenient for you. Surely there are people who are more accustomed to playing with fractional or American odds. You can choose a suitable sport; there are many here. It scans more than 50 bookmakers for sure, which is more than enough. I sometimes drop in and look at the lines; you can always find a suitable surebet. The only thing is that the site itself sometimes slows down, but nothing critical.
