SMARTSCANER

Fork.bet

A young scanner that began operating at the end of October 2020. At the moment, it works with 16 bookmakers. It searches for surebets both prematch and during the match. Value bets and middles are also provided by the service.

Fork.bet – a young scanner that began operating at the end of October. At the moment, it works with 16 bookmakers:

  • 1xbet
  • Leon
  • Fonbet
  • Olimp
  • Ligastavok
  • Betcity
  • Sbobet
  • Marathon
  • Pinnacle
  • Zenit
  • Mostbet
  • Baltbet
  • Bwin
  • Favbet
  • 1win
  • 10bet

across 12 sports.  For reasonable earnings from surebets, this list is undoubtedly extremely small and does not include many popular bookmakers. However, it may be sufficient to get started.

Important! This warning applies to all new services that scan bookmaker lines. We strongly recommend carefully considering the results provided by new scanners without a long operating history. Often, due to the specifics of the software, server load and other force majeure circumstances, odds may differ and may even fail to create an arbitrage betting advantage. Ultimately, this may result in the player losing money. Such a situation will not necessarily occur, but it is quite likely and familiar to us from analyzing the work of other surebet scanners. 

In addition to surebets, the scanner's results also include overweighed bets and middles. Commendable. 

The pricing policy is quite reasonable, which is unsurprising for a young scanner. For users' convenience, 3 plans have been introduced: Prematch, Live and Prematch + Live. Subscription duration ranges from 1 to 30 days. All found arbitrage betting situations with profit up to 1% are presented free of charge.

Since the scanner is completely new, we strongly recommend checking that it is working correctly. For example, the fact that the subscription price does not change when the number of days changes suggests that even such a «sales» page is still unfinished and needs refinement. 

The scanner is available in Russian and English. But the name fork.bet suggests that they do not plan to promote it outside the Russian-speaking environment – after all, fork means a fork as a table utensil, and no English-speaking user will perceive this site as being about bookmaker arbitrage betting. Why, then, make an English version?

The interface of the Fork.bet website is concise and not overloaded with unnecessary elements. Actually, no, the “bugs” raise questions:

Интерфейс сканера бк вилок Fork.bet

This interface element was created to inform the service administration when an error is found. The intention is understandable and, generally speaking, even somewhat justified. On the other hand, shifting error filtering onto clients is, as it seems, not what those very clients come to the service website for and pay their money for. It brings to mind something about using someone else's hands to rake in the heat.

However, we will not be too picky. Both the website interface and all of its functionality may change many more times, and they surely will. The reality is that there is fairly strong competition in the niche of finding arbitrage betting situations in sporting events. And it is still too early to compare Forkbet with such monsters as AllBestBsts or BreakingBet. And for a young service, Forkbet looks quite good.

UPD. Three hours after publication: in the very first hours after publication, we recorded the appearance of a review that looked like it was misleading clients. We will not state this unequivocally, but there is serious suspicion of dishonest actions by the service during its own promotion. This is not a good sign. Those who try to deceive clients before they have even paid may possibly deceive them later as well. We hope that this is merely a coincidence or misunderstanding. Nevertheless, we are recording it.

Feedbacks of scanner

In your description:"..the subscription price does not change when the number of days changes" Strange, everything changes for me. The scanner is okay.

 

SmartScaner.com administration comment

This comment is highly likely to be inauthentic, as is the rating. We do not write comments to order and try to control the quality of the comments left. However, despite this possibility, there is a chance that the comment is genuine. Therefore, we are leaving it, but drawing your attention to this.

Read more →

Excellent, the low rating is completely undeserved!

SmartScaner.com administration comment:

This review was posted by a user who provided a fake Email. In accordance with our site's transparency policy, we publish all reviews, but warn our readers about possible vote manipulation. Be careful and rely on your own common sense!

Read more →

Complete nonsense, how can you charge money for such g...?

Read more →

The site is raw and has bugs. But surprisingly, the admins respond quickly and are willing to engage in dialogue. I’ll put it this way: looking ahead, the site left me with more positive impressions than negative ones. They need to expand both the events and the bookmakers, but for an initial stage it’s not bad at all. Plus, they aren’t charging exorbitant prices from the outset.

Read more →