Profitable, convenient, reliable. That is it in three words. More specifically, I like the subscription terms and the fact that I can figure out the offered functions without having any expert knowledge. I find it difficult to understand all sorts of value bets and middles, but I do fairly well with surebets. The only thing I would like to improve is the number of sports. It is interesting to play occasionally in unfamiliar territory and at the same time see the local peculiarities, but in this respect everything here is as standard as possible. Nevertheless, I do not want to change scanners.
User Reviews of Surebet Scanners
Reviews of scanners bookmaker forks
The position of the administration of the project is such that there can exist no question that it would be impossible to solve.
So share your opinions, join the discussion. We are grateful for all the comments!
I also decided to leave a review after a month of working with BreakingBet. I can say that for professionals who have been doing arbitrage betting for more than just a few days, there are better scanners. The same ABB. But this one has its own advantages. Firstly, I like the simplicity of the site. You quickly find the necessary data and can navigate practically by touch. Secondly, the subscription is cheap here. Obviously, if you play successfully for a long time, the price isn't so important, but in the early stages it's better to pay less and invest more in the business. Thirdly, the odds rarely mess up. Glitches happen, but not as often as on other sites. There are disadvantages too, of course. For example, few bookmakers are analyzed, and in live there are even fewer of them. But overall, a solid, well-deserved four.
A very pleasant and convenient scanner. Unlike other websites and applications, this resource is aimed specifically at finding surebets and has few other features. In my opinion, that’s a plus, because users can quickly find what they need instead of digging through other tabs. I like that there are always enough matches selected here, although I barely have time to look through a quarter of them. A lot of bookmakers are covered, but I haven’t come across any names I knew absolutely nothing about. Plus, the subscription isn’t among the most expensive—the price justifies itself. I wish the developers continued success and growth.
Not a bad scanner for beginners, with its own shortcomings. I’m not sure Positive deserves its place at the top of the rankings, since objectively there are quite a few better platforms. At the same time, I can understand those who prefer to use it rather than some more popular site. Personally, I’m taking a short break right now, so I’m studying the market more than participating in it, and I can say that all scanners have downsides. But with Positive, these downsides are open and on the surface. Players quickly learn about the shortcomings and are able to deal with them, which works in the developers’ favor.
Personally, I liked that with one subscription I get access to all the scanner's features. You can look at surebets and middles if you feel like it. I am personally familiar with one program where each offering required a separate subscription, which came as an unpleasant surprise. Otherwise, it is a fairly standard scanner. If you take the standard advantages and disadvantages from all the top resources, this is their embodiment in every respect. The main thing is that you can bet, and bet successfully, and nothing more is required.
I took out a subscription to Позитив a couple of months ago. I read a lot of reviews and looked at all sorts of ratings, and decided that there is no perfect platform anyway, so why not try this option. After some time, I can say that I do not regret my choice. Most of the information in the reviews was confirmed, but everything turned out not to be as critical as they described. Yes, there are issues with surebets and there are lags, but where are there none? As soon as a scanner appears that completely eliminates such problems, the others will cease to exist. I give it four stars because the developers are in no hurry to improve the program. Perhaps they think everything is fine as it is, or perhaps it is something else.
I don’t know why there are so many dissatisfied people. In my opinion, it’s an excellent scanner. Everything is simple and clear, and I don’t encounter any problems while using it. I can calmly open it to study prematch bets, choose a couple or three suitable surebets, compare them, and make sure everything is fine. Or I can rush into live betting and place a bet on what’s offered in about 20 seconds. I’ve never had it happen that I placed a bet without checking and then discovered that the scanner had messed up. I can trust it and feel at ease. If someone asks which program I would recommend for arbitrage betting, I recommend Positive. So far, I haven’t received any negativity in response.
I first saw that there were free surebets and decided to see how everything worked. The free options turned out to be some kind of crap. I thought, all right, I will take a one-month subscription; so many people use it and do not complain, so I must be missing something. And it turned out that I really was missing something. How can this scanner be considered good at all? It does not even have a basic calculator to calculate everything. I calculate manually and waste time; playing this way live is, to put it mildly, difficult. And if I manage to keep up, it turns out that the odds are bogus, everything has already changed, and all the calculations can be thrown in the trash. If it is still tolerable in the line, then live makes this scanner for masochists, no other way to put it.
I first saw that there were free surebets and decided to see how everything worked. The free options turned out to be some kind of crap. I thought, all right, I will take a one-month subscription; so many people use it and do not complain, so I must be missing something. And it turned out that I really was missing something. How can this scanner be considered good at all? It does not even have a basic calculator to calculate everything. I calculate manually and waste time; playing this way live is, to put it mildly, difficult. And if I manage to keep up, it turns out that the odds are bogus, everything has already changed, and all the calculations can be thrown in the trash. If it is still tolerable in the line, then live makes this scanner for masochists, no other way to put it.
What I like about this scanner is that the filters here are as simple as possible. You go to the proposed surebets, choose your sport, event type, surebet size and everything else you want. You can look by bookmaker too, of course, since I personally am simply too lazy to open accounts everywhere. What I do not like is that the system sometimes slows down. It does not happen often, but it does happen. And it is really annoying. I understand that nobody is protected from this, but when you have already prepared everything and it freezes, you want to close the site immediately and never open it again.
