User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

Everything about working with «Позитив» suits me. That is, I adapted to it, and it adapted to me. The familiar button layout, the clear Russian-language menu, and the number of scanned lines—more than 20—are more than enough. The subscription also pays for itself. I subscribe for a quarter for 199$. Fully recouped through winning Live bets. It is also convenient to pay for the plan, since I work with WebMoney. If there are glitches, they are rare, and the support service helps resolve all force majeure situations promptly.

Regarding payment for using the scanner. This can be viewed in two ways. On the one hand, a monthly fee of 4,5 thousand rubles is not cheap, but PositiveBet provides an overview of around three dozen bookmakers plus foreign ones at once. Again, it makes no sense to place surebets with a bankroll of less than 10 thousand rubles, since you also have to “cough up” almost half again for paying for the services. For beginners with no experience betting on surebets, this is problematic.

I looked over the functionality of the PositiveВet scanner. I’m a little disappointed. Despite the relatively low cost of using the service, only 5 sports are scanned, obviously the main ones. The bookmaker selection is also rather poor — 25 lines. In addition, the resource doesn’t work with prematch bets. I would like more functionality.

Bohdan, manager

I have been using the scanner for six months. Overall, it is a decent resource with a clear
interface and a convenient calculator. I work constantly in automatic
update mode. This saves time and trains attention so as not to miss
the found arbitrage situations displayed on the screen. It is pleasing that
positivebet is constantly searching for new solutions. But perhaps because of
overcrowding with users and constant monitoring by surebet bettors,
there are malfunctions, and surebets sometimes get lost.

BreakingBet is not yet fully developed, but even now it is clear that after
the development is finished, it risks topping the scanner rankings. For now, I would rate it as
“satisfactory” - everything works, with many nice features, including free
access. The only issue is that there are very few bookmakers, currently at most 25. Perhaps
the developers will add more later, but for now this is not enough; it is easy to get burned on professional betting with a
bookmaker.

Exactly what beginner players need. High profitability of arbs with
no actual costs for access to them. You can immediately set the
margin, which filters out unnecessary info. There are too few filters, but those presented are
simple and informative. A solid four. Looking forward to the release.

At first, I was somewhat afraid to work with BreakingBet. But I tried it out and realized that it is practically a gold mine, a “bottomless treasure.” Yes, glitches sometimes occur and a surebet slips away. Well, you shouldn't play with your entire bankroll; bets should be made intelligently. Besides, the convenient calculator immediately lets you understand which direction to look in. And my advice is, don't constantly play at the same bookmakers supported by BreakingBet; it's better to change them periodically. Say, bet with some today and with others tomorrow.

What can be said about BreakingBet? Their plans are Napoleonic: they want to attract as many users as possible with low prices and profitable surebets in free mode. The only problem is that their surebets are often incorrect. I lost almost my entire bankroll and do not want to have anything more to do with this outfit; there are normal scanners too. So our paths part here.

It seems to me that the service is still completely “raw.” Some difficulties with updates and various other minor problems often arise. Overall, it works and is “fine,” but I will probably wait for the final release rather than this “crooked beta.” Otherwise, their errors in the results are not merely embarrassing; I could also take quite a hit to my bankroll.

Let me start by saying that I play a lot and professionally. But BreakingBet is my backup when I do not want to get too deeply involved in something, just to turn over my bankroll with a small profit. It is convenient to do that here because of the quick transition from the interface directly to the bookmaker's website. I play in private mode and access it through a proxy, so they are unlikely to identify me in particular. When the scanner grows out of test mode, it will really be a bomb.

I am new in betting. I think that for a beginner who starts playing with arbs, the PositiveBet scanner is the best option so far. It has a good reputation for years. Then, today it is one of the cheapest online services that find Live arbs. Sign in without problems. Not much information required: password, e-mail address, verification code, login. It is as easy as it gets, isn’t it?