User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

A decent scanner, but its only advantage is the price. In every other respect, the same surebet scans prematch much better, and allbestbets is many times better. There is nothing outstanding in live betting either; позитивбет clearly outperforms it there. Therefore, a three.

I've tried all the scanners in prematch and can say with certainty that there is nothing better on the market than allbestbets for prematch surebets. The subscription is of course rather expensive, but it's more useful than cheap alternatives that barely spit out any old surebets. The most convenient interface among all those available. One problem is that, from Russia, in the current situation, it can't be paid for except through bitpay, and as I understand it, the team isn't going to do anything about this. Either for political reasons or for some other reasons. I consider that wrong. Surebets should be above politics!) Especially since I am sure that the overwhelming majority of clients are from Russia. Overall, an excellent scanner; I hope and believe that the administration will take measures regarding payment from Russia.

A highly competitive scanner. The scanning quality is worse than in allbestbets, but it costs less, there are more bookmakers, and value bets are included in the price. It also seemed to me that this scanner produces rather clever types of 3-outcome surebets that, for example, I had not encountered in allbestbets, especially in CS GO. Overall, the impression is positive. Among prematch scanners for CIS bookmakers, this is currently the only sensible alternative to allbestbets.

A good scanner for live betting at a reasonable price. High speed, a decent range of settings, and a good number of bookmakers. Definitely better than breakingbet; I compared them online. But it periodically produces erroneous surebets. It scans different markets and spits them out as a surebet. Of course, you have to monitor this yourself, but in live betting it’s quite difficult to react that quickly. As a result, both legs can fail, leading to a losing session. The administration acknowledges the errors and writes "thank you," but refuses to offer any kind of perk, such as a couple of subscription days. So I’m giving it four stars.

I've been using the scanner continuously for 7 years. Until recently, it was the best in my opinion, and most importantly, convenient. Lately, it has simply been turning into a dump. I use a dozen bookmakers with it, and at least 6 out of 10 are sluggish during scanning. That was almost always the case, and a couple of seconds wasn't critical for me, but for someone who joined recently, it will seem inconvenient and, to put it mildly, strange. Fine, I know all these quirks and have adapted. And lately, the 3-4 bookmakers that are the main ones—the exchange and the sportsbook—have stopped working properly. And in light of the fact that they have stopped responding to criticism by email—it's a complete disaster! I hope they will still find competent programmers and fix things.

A decent scanner that costs little, and with discounts the plans can be purchased at extremely low prices. I consider the poor site navigation a significant drawback. Everything is confusing, and there is no dedicated section for reviewing and purchasing plans. There are many different settings, but they are more confusing than helpful. Still, I have figured some of it out by now and am starting to earn money.

Well, far from being top-notch, but occasionally excellent options come through that can be used. I use it in addition to ABB, since the results are somewhat different after all, and that is pleasing

An average bookmaker, as there are plenty of flaws. I really disliked that you have to pay extra for additional bookmakers in the results. It is clear that using all of them is unrealistic, but the main selection here is so-so. Moreover, the amounts are not small, and this is not for continuous use but only for about a month. The official website is also considered a drawback. The constant shifts in settings do not suit me, especially in live mode, when the meaning of any bet at all is lost within a few seconds.

I have been working with this service for quite a while, and everything is fairly good. I cannot say that I have earned millions, but it is enough for now, and hardly anyone will manage that anyway, since bookmakers are not fools either. Given the huge choice of bookmakers in Forks, you can change them quite often and avoid having your limits cut. I especially like the parameter imitation function, as well as the high-quality user emulation.

An unstable scanner in terms of service: sometimes it gives many excellent surebets all at once, and sometimes it does not provide anything reasonable at all. It’s encouraging that the latter has been happening much less often lately; that means the project is alive, and I’m waiting for improvements

I didn't see anything special, but I can't call it a bad fork either. Just a middle-of-the-road option that lets you earn a bit of extra money for a reasonable fee

I abandoned the service after an unclear situation with the plans. I paid for everything, and the subscription seemed to be activated, but the next day it was demo again. I wrote to the managers, they fixed it, and the situation repeated another 5 times over the course of a month. As for the listings – there seem to be enough offers, but some arrive late and accordingly it is impossible to place bets live. I'll simply use it until the subscription ends and hope that at least I can make back the money spent on prematch bets. It seems not everything is that bad, but the shortcomings spoil the overall impression