User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

As I see it, Positive is worth its money, although I didn't see anything exceptionally profitable. For professionals, all the offers that immediately stand out when analyzing the odds are clear. I would like the scanner's breakdown to be better. I really liked the middles and the ability to pause the subscription.

The service is fire, but far from perfect. Empty entries often slip through in prematch, and, most frustratingly, in live as well. I believe in the power of live, so errors are critical for me, as they often result in a serious loss of money

I couldn't find a worthy platform for a long time to finally take down greedy bookmakers. Everything worked out with BreakingBet. Surebets are noticed immediately in the prematch, but live is still an untouched field for work. While they haven't closed the loopholes here, you need to hurry, and I think everything will go great with BB.

Not a bad scanner, but for no-name bookmakers it always gives a cooler line-up than for top brands. And it's boring in terms of sports, especially regarding the inclusion of the best matches. If anyone thinks they can bet under the radar on some Ecuadorian championship, they are seriously mistaken. Well, it's not that the scanner is getting worse, but the bookmakers are getting smarter (

Excellent site that really helps. Lots of settings, and I especially liked the profit filters—a pretty tempting lure, but some events do fully match and there is a chance of reaching 300-400% profit, as they promise. The truth is, if you place a large stake, there is an equal chance that the bookmaker will block the account. Overall, at your own risk, but the scanner is good, especially since they constantly offer discounts on the plans.

Personally, I found it so-so, especially the unfinished, buggy website really annoys me. I set the time zone, and it still switches back to the default after a couple of seconds. I looked at the plans, and they seemed reasonably priced, but once the payment went through, it charged 200 euros instead of the promised 17. Only later did I notice that this was the amount for a month. Why write about a monthly payment on a yearly plan? But whatever, I bought it and, by and large, lost nothing – after 5 months I am already up +500 euros in profit, and we are moving on. I would have given it 5, but there are still plenty of shortcomings

A decent scanner that sometimes offers absolutely insane discounts on plans. I've only known the service for no more than a month so far, but I'm practically satisfied with everything. I don't think my opinion will change, and I didn't give it five stars so they would continue improving and operate at the highest level!

A friend recommended BetWasp, but when I found out that it was an ОББ project, I did not register, since I already have an account with ОББ. However, a little later I did buy a plan on BetWasp too, because there was a substantial discount before New Year. You know, there is a difference, but I would not say it is large. I will use both, but I still think I should choose one scanner.

I’ve been with Arb for quite a while and am absolutely satisfied with everything. There have been no problems, only positive experiences and lots of surebets. Over time I also studied middles and now use them confidently. The delivery speed is great, as is the provided market breakdown

A decent scanner that costs little, and with discounts the plans can be purchased at extremely low prices. I consider the poor site navigation a significant drawback. Everything is confusing, and there is no dedicated section for reviewing and purchasing plans. There are many different settings, but they are more confusing than helpful. Still, I have figured some of it out by now and am starting to earn money.

Well, far from being top-notch, but occasionally excellent options come through that can be used. I use it in addition to ABB, since the results are somewhat different after all, and that is pleasing

An average bookmaker in terms of quality, since there are plenty of shortcomings. I really disliked that you need to pay extra for additional bookmakers in the results. Obviously, it is impossible to include everyone, but the main selection here is so-so. The amounts are substantial, and this is not for ongoing use but only for about a month. The official site is also considered a disadvantage. Constant shifts in the settings do not suit me, especially in live, when within a few seconds the point of any bet at all is lost.