User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

 I believe that everything should be orderly and that one should play carefully.
Therefore, Surebet has become my favorite tool, because it has everything that
is needed: a pleasant interface and a large number of bookmakers in
scanning. Moreover, only this service indicates who initiated the inflated odds - the risk of making a mistake falls.

If you are looking for a full-fledged surebet scanner, then Surebet should be
avoided - the once-announced live scanning still has not been
implemented, and it is unclear why. After all, there are supposedly enough subscribers to
maintain a staff of programmers, the service is popular, and the code is not complicated.
So I will have to look for something else, because I am already tired of prematch only.

The developers of BMBets should start thinking about what is wrong with their scanner. After all, it is unlikely that betters stay with them for longer than a month. The scanning speed is disgusting, and there is no live betting.. Yes, by the way, the surebets shown are not always valid.

I play with BMBets and not unsuccessfully. I believe that a true surebetter can only be a prematch better, while only hasty people and lovers of easy money play live, which turns betting into some kind of craft rather than an art. Good presentation of surebets, many bookmakers. The non-Russian interface somewhat spoils the impression, but it is no big deal; you can figure out the scanner in a day or two.

Everyone is speaking negatively about BMBets. However, I've been using the service for quite a long time already, and I haven't experienced any particular problems. I like how filtering by bets and events is implemented. I believe the scanner is one of the few that doesn't stop developing, and gets better and better every year.

I have tried many different scanners, and I tried this one too. But I did not
stay on BMBets - there is too much unjustified risk of getting flagged, which cuts the limit on
bets. To each their own, but this is critical for me. Otherwise, it is an ordinary scanner that does not
stand out much among dozens like it. It even falls somewhat short of
many startups because it lacks live.

A basically decent scanner, but everything is ruined by the depressingly low scanning speed
While it scans and produces a result, a lot of time passes,
and you may simply fail to place a bet in time. It is especially frustrating when a surebet
is available at high odds. Otherwise, it suits me, and even working
only in prematch does not bother me.

A nice service for permanent pre-match betting. Offers handy stuff such as calculator. Though I’m a newbie in betting, but this one appeared to be the most convenient and offered the greatest number of sports supported (I’m very fond of cricket – it’s not that popular, but this service supports it as well). I must also note the clarity of coefficients that enables to estimate the bet profitability.

I've been playing for 10 years and haven't found better middles and arbitrage betting on live. For a long time I was looking for a normal scanner and came across OddStorm. And it won me over with its simplicity and functionality. With it, it's easy to build a decent bankroll, even though the subscription is somewhat expensive; the service is fully justified. But for occasional bets, it simply doesn't fit – the price tag isn't justified. With it, you can and must play big.

Indeed, OddStorm looks like a good scanner. It has everything a professional player needs. If only it were not for the subscription price. To put it kindly, it is actually overpriced by an order of magnitude. I found a couple of cheaper scanners without losing anything in convenience. And as for scanning speed, I play prematch, and 5 seconds suits me from start to finish.

If you feel bold, buy a subscription to OddStorm, say goodbye to your hard-earned money, and bankrupt the bookmaker along the way. I don’t know what kind of server they have over there, but I get longer pings than their update rate claims. Moreover, the support, supposedly of the "priority type," actually consists of some kind of blond uncle who doesn’t understand the nature of the matter or the requirements. In the "demo version," supposedly free, everything worked perfectly. Overall, a rip-off.