SMARTSCANER

User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

Reviews of scanners bookmaker forks

The position of the administration of the project is such that there can exist no question that it would be impossible to solve.
So share your opinions, join the discussion. We are grateful for all the comments!

I barely figured out how to download the demo to test it, but the scanner itself is decent; I've been using it for the second month—so far, it suits me

For manual surebets, finding the best odds is top-notch, started it up, chose a bookmaker for the first leg, then also turned on the overlaps.

The sound of the surebets is annoying, and it can't be changed! Otherwise the scanner is awesome, fast, functional and inexpensive, just like you-know-who))

It parses 1win poorly, as well as Olimp; football is still possible, but tennis is almost impossible. Plus, GG.bet works only for esports. The price has become 100$. There is no Betfair exchange, only Betfair as a bookmaker. It does not show surebets for lower leagues.

Excellent scanner, I've been using it for many years. I tried many, but returned to it. Live surebets aren't for me; I prefer to place everything without rushing—and there is nothing in these surebets except the good old surebet. The price is reasonable too, lower than all the others; there are no account restrictions and other such nonsense

Read more →

Come on! Is it still alive??? I deliberately visited the site – nostalgia hit me right away, everything is just like at the very beginning of my surebetting journey 12 years ago. A lot of water has flowed under the bridge, as they say, and the scanner still works like a charm. It could use some kind of redesign, and it would definitely be better than all the rest. 

Read more →

Does anyone still use Positiv? Really?!! With cheaper and higher-quality scanners available, I don't understand how anyone still buys it. 

And they also block accounts left and right. I don't recommend it.

Read more →

After the upgrade  and price increase, the appeal of breaking has decreased significantly. There are not that many reasons to buy a subscription, the scanner works like all the others, and the price is the same as everyone else’s – what are its advantages?

That’s what I don’t know either

Read more →

Everything is old-school, those who have used it will understand what I mean. 

The scanner handles its task perfectly, finds surebets, and hardly produces any errors. Plus, it offers a lot for free; for example, value bets — other scanners charge extra for them.

There’s nothing better for now, so I won’t switch.

Read more →

Does anyone know whether they will work properly again? Or should we stop waiting. 

I don't understand the enthusiastic reviews of the BB scanner. It's like everyone else's; at least it used to cost less. 

Not bad, but not the best either. I specifically compared the prematch results from this scanner with those of another one from this site, but cheaper. They are practically identical, so why pay more?

Read more →

The scanner, BreakingBet, is not bad, but not perfect. It has good tools for finding surebets, especially for major markets and popular sports. But sometimes some surebets turn out to be unavailable, or the odds change quickly before I manage to place a bet. I think this is a problem with most scanners, but I would like greater stability. Overall, it is suitable for daily use, but perhaps in the future I will try other scanners for comparison.

Read more →