User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

An average surebet scanner, there are often glitches, sometimes surebets come with different outcomes for one match, and once I lost money because I didn’t look at the tournament. They gave me a surebet for the World Championship for 18-year-olds, but it turned out there was also one running for 21-year-olds) well, this is basically my fault, but such issues need to be worked on.

Middles are good, but still do not twist 100% will never be , although you can still get in. Especially the Polish ones are great , but I just want to warn you -it's better to read and read first the info about all the offers of the scanner, so as not to waste money.

Not a bad scanner, there are enough surebets and everything else, but lately it seems to me that there are leaks somewhere. I have already been banned on Marathon, and Betcity blocked me after the second surebet; I registered on William hill, and so far they have not limited me)

I purchased a live subscription for a month and it didn't go very well, mostly refunds and losses, but there are also good odds on wins, so roughly speaking I didn't lose a damn thing, but I did earn about 500-1000 rubles. Now I've decided to try prematch; in my opinion, everything can be analyzed better, otherwise I chased the money)

Overall, the service is not bad, but only for those who have Skrill, Neteller, or PayPal. This aspect has not been thought through for the Russian Federation, so you have to go to some trouble to buy a subscription, although this is precisely something the company should have worked out at the highest level, in my opinion

Excellent scanner; for those having problems with blocks and bans, I recommend not switching directly from the service to a bookmaker, because a friend works at one bookmaker and said that bookmakers notice all these switches. So if you use Forks wisely, you can play normally, make money, and have enough for everything

The surebet service is not bad and there are enough offers, but it scans many makeshift bookmakers, and some are completely blocked for betting. I liked the prices; if they updated the list of bookmakers, I would give it five stars)

A good choice for beginners, and experienced users will find it suitable too. I have been betting for a long time, but I tried to avoid scanners like this because I was afraid of losing good accounts at Bet365 and William Hill. But I decided to try it when my balance declined, and I am still playing with particular pleasure)

There are all sorts of possibilities, but believe me, surebets will appear in abundance if you take the top packages, and they are insanely expensive. Out of curiosity, I used the trial option; they are certainly quite attractive, but I think that is to get people to buy subscriptions. I bought a daily package on Saturday, when there were tons of different matches and tournaments, but only 8 surebets arrived, and only 5 of those worked.

Working with the scanner seemed unprofitable for the first 2 months, but I started working with the service when there were breaks in the football championships. Now that there are plenty of matches, it sometimes produces decent surebets; odds above 2.5 even come up in matches that are quite likely to pass. In general, you need to test and adjust everything; there are plenty of bookmakers for scanning, so I don't see a problem with changing tactics, which I successfully managed to do)

The prices for the plans are reasonable, and the constant discounts are always welcome) You can also filter out various junk in the bets by using middles. I also want to note the decent bookmakers on the list, which are popular rather than included just for show

The scanner meets my needs in every respect; the cost is average, and you can find one cheaper, but the surebets and bookmaker selection are excellent, so there's no need to overpay for all sorts of unnecessary operators. I recouped the weekly subscription in 3 days; I think I'll take a shot at the monthly one. If I recoup it in a week, the profit will be fantastic)