User Reviews of Surebet Scanners

The scanner is really very raw. It often shows bogus surebets—not valid ones (yesterday it was complete nonsense). The names of the teams (in the surebets), and even their order, are displayed in the scanner differently from the bookmaker’s website. My bookmakers are on virtual machines, while the scanner is on the host—I switch to surebets manually, so the display is inconvenient for me. When the scanner shows a surebet in a set (period, quarter), it does not show that the surebet is in a set (you have to figure it out yourself). My rating is -2.

I would like to note the prompt work of the support service. Very fast and polite. Several times I sent them messages about erroneous surebets, and in gratitude for the cooperation they gave me a one-week subscription. A small thing, but pleasant, as they say. It was not difficult for me to report it; I am all for such young services developing.

I can rate the quality of the work as average; after all, many errors still remain. I added a point for generosity.

An old friend is better than two new ones. This expression also applies to scanners. 

During my time with surebets, I tried probably every scanner. And I still return to Шурбет. 

I don't bet live; I have enough stress as it is. Overpaying for it when I don't use it is stupid. The subscription price in dollars hasn't changed for about 5 years, which suits me extremely well. 

I believe that Шурбет was and remains a very good scanner for a pleasant price.

It turns out this is the same as Positive, but with a betting plugin.

Plugins are usually provided free of charge with a subscription purchase, as, for example, with AllBestBets. But here you have to overpay for it every month. I have a negative attitude toward such rip-offs out of nowhere.

The price is greatly inflated; nowadays you can choose something much cheaper and the quality will be no worse.

Since there are extremely few reviews, I decided to test this product myself.

I took a subscription for a week so that I would have more time and an opportunity to assess all the pros and cons. 

Pros:

- price

Cons:

everything else. There are still many errors in the surebets. Polish middles are a separate story; it seems only the creators understand them, and even then I'm not sure about that. As we were taught in the army: if you understood something, you can explain it to someone else. On the site, however, the explanation is given in such a way that it becomes even more incomprehensible.

There is no subscription freeze. For a week, this is not critical, but if you take, for example, a one-year subscription, the feature becomes extremely necessary.

For now, I give the scanner a three, an average one at that. I don't want to continue buying a subscription for now; I'll look elsewhere.

I don't really understand how your ranking was compiled. It is strange to see Breaking Bet in first place.

The scanner is decent, really not bad, but calling it the best is wrong. There are much better ones, ABB itself, for example. Yes, its subscription is considerably more expensive, but the quality of its performance is incomparably higher. I tried working with Breaking Bet, but for the first time in my life I did not make it to the end of the subscription; I no longer had the nerves for the constant errors and freezes. Maybe something has changed for them, but I have no desire to try again.

I don’t understand the enthusiastic reviews from before. What’s more, now you have to access it through Tor, for example. Because they have restrictions on Russian IPs and don’t show surebets.

Support doesn’t respond; it feels as though it doesn’t exist. 

In my opinion, the site looks abandoned.

At last, the owners of ollbestbets have listened to reason and lowered their prices. 

The quality of their scanning is the very best, but the price for live always put people off. I had to get subscriptions from other scanners; after all, previously you still had to recoup 200 euros. Now the price has become quite acceptable, 100 euros, compared with competitors .

Is this reduction temporary, or will it always be this way?