-
Initial stake
-
The player sets a starting bankroll (e.g. 100€) and a fixed percentage (e.g. 5% = 5€).
-
If a win: the bankroll increases (100€ + profit), and the next stake is calculated on the new amount.
-
If a loss: the next stake remains at 5% but is calculated on the reduced bankroll (e.g. 95€ → 4,75€).
-
Dynamic adjustment
-
Objective
Recover losses through winning bets with high odds, without exponential stake increases as in the Martingale.
Advantages of the strategy
✅ Reduced risk of ruin - Losses are mitigated by decreasing stakes.
✅ Flexibility - Works with different odds (not only 2,00+).
✅ Long-term stability - Preserves the bankroll during losing streaks.
Disadvantages and risks
❌ Slow growth of winnings - Less aggressive than other strategies.
❌ Dependence on high odds - Requires odds of at least 1,8 to recover losses.
❌ Psychological pressure - Discipline is required to maintain the percentage after losses.
Calculation example
| Step |
Bankroll |
Stake (5%) |
Odds |
Result |
New Bankroll |
| 1 |
100€ |
5€ |
1,8 |
Won |
104€ |
| 2 |
104€ |
5,20€ |
1,5 |
Lost |
98,80€ |
| 3 |
98,80€ |
4,94€ |
2,0 |
Won |
103,68€ |
Usage tips
-
Choose reliable events - Optimal for favorites (odds 1,5-2,0).
-
Limit the percentage - 1 to 5% of the bankroll is ideal.
-
Combine with analysis - Use statistics, not just the financial model.
Conclusion
The Sliding Bank is a safer alternative to the Martingale, but requires patience and discipline. Ideal for bettors focused on long-term profits.
For safer betting strategies, consult this article.